Japan vs Sudan: Crop Residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O
Crop Residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time
- Japan
- Sudan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 523.59 kt against 514.31 kt in Sudan, a difference of 9.28 kt.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 52nd and Sudan ranks 54th of 183 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 696.18 kt | 644.97 kt | 51.21 kt | Japan |
| 2020s | 680.21 kt | 612.91 kt | 67.3 kt | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residues — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Japan or Sudan?
- Japan, at 523.59 kt against 514.31 kt in Sudan as of 2050.
- What is the difference in crop residues — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Japan and Sudan?
- 9.28 kt, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Sudan rank globally for crop residues — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
- Japan ranks 52nd and Sudan ranks 54th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop Residues — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf