Norway vs South Sudan: Crop Residues — Emissions (N2O)
Crop Residues — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Norway
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.3499 kt against 0.3366 kt in Norway, a difference of 0.0133 kt.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Norway ranks 125th and South Sudan ranks 124th of 215 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.2744 kt | 0.2898 kt | 0.0153 kt | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.2702 kt | 0.3118 kt | 0.0415 kt | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residues — emissions, Norway or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.3499 kt against 0.3366 kt in Norway as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residues — emissions between Norway and South Sudan?
- 0.0133 kt, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Norway and South Sudan rank globally for crop residues — emissions?
- Norway ranks 125th and South Sudan ranks 124th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop Residues — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf