Czechoslovakia vs Melanesia: Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate

Czechoslovakia
-12.88 % change on previous year
in 1992
Melanesia
-11.76 % change on previous year
in 2023
Czechoslovakia rank
158th
Melanesia rank
156th

Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Czechoslovakia
  • Melanesia
-30-20-100102030196219922023

How they compare

Melanesia currently reports -11.76 % change on previous year against -12.88 % change on previous year in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 1.12 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Melanesia ahead.

Czechoslovakia ranks 158th and Melanesia ranks 156th of 186 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Czechoslovakia averaged higher in 2 and Melanesia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechoslovakia Melanesia Difference Ahead
1960s 3.23 % change on previous year -0.9385 % change on previous year 4.17 % change on previous year Czechoslovakia
1970s 1.29 % change on previous year 2.84 % change on previous year 1.55 % change on previous year Melanesia
1980s 2.52 % change on previous year 1.1 % change on previous year 1.42 % change on previous year Czechoslovakia
1990s -4.85 % change on previous year -3.33 % change on previous year 1.52 % change on previous year Melanesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residues — indirect emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Czechoslovakia or Melanesia?
Melanesia, at -11.76 % change on previous year against -12.88 % change on previous year in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residues — indirect emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Czechoslovakia and Melanesia?
1.12 % change on previous year, with Melanesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Melanesia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1992.
How do Czechoslovakia and Melanesia rank globally for crop residues — indirect emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
Czechoslovakia ranks 158th and Melanesia ranks 156th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechoslovakia vs Melanesia: Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/czechoslovakia/melanesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/czechoslovakia/melanesia/">Czechoslovakia vs Melanesia: Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 11,986 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.