Iceland vs Sweden: Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate

Iceland
-20 % change on previous year
in 2023
Sweden
-22.27 % change on previous year
in 2023
Iceland rank
166th
Sweden rank
168th

Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Iceland
  • Sweden
-1000100200196219922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports -20 % change on previous year against -22.27 % change on previous year in Sweden, a difference of 2.27 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 34 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 166th and Sweden ranks 168th of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s -33.33 % change on previous year 1.28 % change on previous year 34.62 % change on previous year Sweden
1970s 0 % change on previous year 3.21 % change on previous year 3.21 % change on previous year Sweden
1980s 0 % change on previous year 1.02 % change on previous year 1.02 % change on previous year Sweden
1990s 5 % change on previous year 0.0787 % change on previous year 4.92 % change on previous year Iceland
2000s 0 % change on previous year 0.898 % change on previous year 0.898 % change on previous year Sweden
2010s 28.33 % change on previous year 5.41 % change on previous year 22.92 % change on previous year Iceland
2020s 1.25 % change on previous year -6.38 % change on previous year 7.63 % change on previous year Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residues — indirect emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Iceland or Sweden?
Iceland, at -20 % change on previous year against -22.27 % change on previous year in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residues — indirect emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Iceland and Sweden?
2.27 % change on previous year, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Sweden?
60 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Sweden rank globally for crop residues — indirect emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
Iceland ranks 166th and Sweden ranks 168th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Sweden: Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/iceland/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/iceland/sweden/">Iceland vs Sweden: Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
220 places, 11,986 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.