Latvia vs Serbia: Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O), per capita
Latvia
0 kt per person
in 2023
Serbia
0 kt per person
in 2023
Latvia rank
9th
Serbia rank
10th
Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O), per capita over time
- Latvia
- Serbia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Serbia, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Latvia ranks 9th and Serbia ranks 10th of 163 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residues — indirect emissions (n2o), per capita, Latvia or Serbia?
- Latvia, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residues — indirect emissions (n2o), per capita between Latvia and Serbia?
- 0 kt per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Serbia rank globally for crop residues — indirect emissions (n2o), per capita?
- Latvia ranks 9th and Serbia ranks 10th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.