Congo vs Iceland: Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Congo
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
148th
Iceland rank
149th

Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Iceland
000000196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 148th and Iceland ranks 149th of 163 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residues — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Congo or Iceland?
Congo, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residues — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Congo and Iceland?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Iceland rank globally for crop residues — indirect emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 148th and Iceland ranks 149th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Iceland: Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/iceland/">Congo vs Iceland: Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,247 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crop Residues — Indirect emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.