Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Panama: Cropland organic soils — Area, annual growth rate

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Panama
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
1st
Panama rank
2nd

Cropland organic soils — Area, annual growth rate over time

  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
  • Panama
-0.500.51199120072024

How they compare

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Panama, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Panama ahead.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 1st and Panama ranks 2nd of 32 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2239 % change on previous year 0.0072 % change on previous year 0.2167 % change on previous year Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2000s 0.0277 % change on previous year -0.0685 % change on previous year 0.0962 % change on previous year Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2010s -0.0464 % change on previous year 0.0104 % change on previous year 0.0568 % change on previous year Panama
2020s -0.123 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0.123 % change on previous year Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cropland organic soils — area, annual growth rate, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) or Panama?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Panama as of 2024.
What is the difference in cropland organic soils — area, annual growth rate between Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Panama?
0 % change on previous year, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Panama?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Panama rank globally for cropland organic soils — area, annual growth rate?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 1st and Panama ranks 2nd of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland organic soils — Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Panama: Cropland organic soils — Area, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-organic-soils-area-annual-growth-rate/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-organic-soils-area-annual-growth-rate/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/panama/">Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Panama: Cropland organic soils — Area, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cropland organic soils — Area, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
146 places, 4,758 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cropland organic soils — Area. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.