Eswatini vs Ghana: Cropland organic soils — Area, per capita
Eswatini
0 ha per person
in 2024
Ghana
0 ha per person
in 2024
Eswatini rank
83rd
Ghana rank
81st
Cropland organic soils — Area, per capita over time
- Eswatini
- Ghana
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ghana ahead.
Eswatini ranks 83rd and Ghana ranks 81st of 189 countries.
Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Ghana |
| 2000s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Ghana |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Ghana |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cropland organic soils — area, per capita, Eswatini or Ghana?
- Ghana, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cropland organic soils — area, per capita between Eswatini and Ghana?
- 0 ha per person, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Ghana?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Ghana rank globally for cropland organic soils — area, per capita?
- Eswatini ranks 83rd and Ghana ranks 81st of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland organic soils — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cropland organic soils — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.