Ghana vs Nicaragua: Cropland organic soils — Area, per capita
Ghana
0 ha per person
in 2024
Nicaragua
0 ha per person
in 2023
Ghana rank
81st
Nicaragua rank
80th
Cropland organic soils — Area, per capita over time
- Ghana
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Ghana, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Ghana ranks 81st and Nicaragua ranks 80th of 189 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Ghana |
| 2010s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cropland organic soils — area, per capita, Ghana or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Ghana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in cropland organic soils — area, per capita between Ghana and Nicaragua?
- 0 ha per person, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Nicaragua?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Ghana and Nicaragua rank globally for cropland organic soils — area, per capita?
- Ghana ranks 81st and Nicaragua ranks 80th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland organic soils — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cropland organic soils — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.