Sri Lanka vs Uruguay: Cropland organic soils — Area, per capita
Sri Lanka
0.0008 ha per person
in 2024
Uruguay
0.0008 ha per person
in 2024
Sri Lanka rank
53rd
Uruguay rank
52nd
Cropland organic soils — Area, per capita over time
- Sri Lanka
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 0.0008 ha per person against 0.0008 ha per person in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 53rd and Uruguay ranks 52nd of 189 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0011 ha per person | 0.0008 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 0.0009 ha per person | 0.0008 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0.0008 ha per person | 0.0008 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 0.0008 ha per person | 0.0008 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cropland organic soils — area, per capita, Sri Lanka or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 0.0008 ha per person against 0.0008 ha per person in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cropland organic soils — area, per capita between Sri Lanka and Uruguay?
- 0 ha per person, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Uruguay?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Sri Lanka and Uruguay rank globally for cropland organic soils — area, per capita?
- Sri Lanka ranks 53rd and Uruguay ranks 52nd of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland organic soils — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cropland organic soils — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.