Angola vs France: Cropland organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP
Angola
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
France
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Angola rank
52nd
France rank
51st
Cropland organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Angola
- France
How they compare
France currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Angola, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 52nd and France ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 3 and France in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | France | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Angola |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Angola |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | France |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cropland organic soils — area, per unit of gdp, Angola or France?
- France, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Angola as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cropland organic soils — area, per unit of gdp between Angola and France?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and France?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Angola and France rank globally for cropland organic soils — area, per unit of gdp?
- Angola ranks 52nd and France ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cropland organic soils — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.