Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Cropland organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP
Kazakhstan
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Serbia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
88th
Serbia rank
86th
Cropland organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Serbia's figure about 5.2 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 88th and Serbia ranks 86th of 186 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cropland organic soils — area, per unit of gdp, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cropland organic soils — area, per unit of gdp between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for cropland organic soils — area, per unit of gdp?
- Kazakhstan ranks 88th and Serbia ranks 86th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cropland organic soils — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.