Norway vs Panama: Cropland organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP
Norway
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Panama
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Norway rank
43rd
Panama rank
41st
Cropland organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Norway
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Norway, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Norway ranks 43rd and Panama ranks 41st of 186 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Panama |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Panama |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Panama |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cropland organic soils — area, per unit of gdp, Norway or Panama?
- Panama, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cropland organic soils — area, per unit of gdp between Norway and Panama?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Panama?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Norway and Panama rank globally for cropland organic soils — area, per unit of gdp?
- Norway ranks 43rd and Panama ranks 41st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland organic soils — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cropland organic soils — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.