Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Cropland organic soils — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate (N2O)
Cropland organic soils — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate (N2O) over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 1st of 114 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2624 % change on previous year | 0.3571 % change on previous year | 0.0947 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | -0.1473 % change on previous year | 0.0187 % change on previous year | 0.166 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | -0.0719 % change on previous year | -0.0263 % change on previous year | 0.0456 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | -0.0044 % change on previous year | -0.0813 % change on previous year | 0.0769 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cropland organic soils — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Australia and New Zealand or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cropland organic soils — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for cropland organic soils — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 1st of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland organic soils — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cropland organic soils — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.