Ethiopia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Cropland organic soils — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate (N2O)

Ethiopia
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Ethiopia rank
2nd
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
1st

Cropland organic soils — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate (N2O) over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
-5051015199120072024

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Ethiopia ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 2nd and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 1st of 114 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 2 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4252 % change on previous year 0.4057 % change on previous year 0.0194 % change on previous year Ethiopia
2000s 0.3247 % change on previous year 0.0852 % change on previous year 0.2395 % change on previous year Ethiopia
2010s -0.6067 % change on previous year 0.1045 % change on previous year 0.7111 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s -0.3434 % change on previous year -0.1588 % change on previous year 0.1846 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cropland organic soils — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Ethiopia or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Ethiopia, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in cropland organic soils — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Ethiopia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
0 % change on previous year, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Ethiopia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for cropland organic soils — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
Ethiopia ranks 2nd and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 1st of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland organic soils — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Cropland organic soils — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-organic-soils-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/ethiopia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cropland-organic-soils-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/ethiopia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Ethiopia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Cropland organic soils — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cropland organic soils — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
146 places, 4,729 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cropland organic soils — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.