Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs New Zealand: Cropland organic soils — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate (N2O)
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
New Zealand
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
1st
New Zealand rank
2nd
Cropland organic soils — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate (N2O) over time
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
- New Zealand
How they compare
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in New Zealand, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Zealand ahead.
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 2nd of 32 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.33 % change on previous year | -0.4011 % change on previous year | 2.73 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2000s | 0.0852 % change on previous year | -0.3995 % change on previous year | 0.4847 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2010s | 0.1045 % change on previous year | -0.3048 % change on previous year | 0.4093 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2020s | -0.1588 % change on previous year | -0.0686 % change on previous year | 0.0902 % change on previous year | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cropland organic soils — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or New Zealand?
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cropland organic soils — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and New Zealand?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and New Zealand?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and New Zealand rank globally for cropland organic soils — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 2nd of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cropland organic soils — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cropland organic soils — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.