Antigua and Barbuda vs Congo: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from coal
Antigua and Barbuda
23,381 tonnes
in 1956
Congo
36,027 tonnes
in 1958
Antigua and Barbuda rank
162nd
Congo rank
161st
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from coal over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 36,027 tonnes against 23,381 tonnes in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 12,646 tonnes.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.5 times Antigua and Barbuda's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Congo ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 162nd and Congo ranks 161st of 179 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from coal, Antigua and Barbuda or Congo?
- Congo, at 36,027 tonnes against 23,381 tonnes in Antigua and Barbuda as of 1958.
- What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from coal between Antigua and Barbuda and Congo?
- 12,646 tonnes, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Congo?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 1956.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Congo rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from coal?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 162nd and Congo ranks 161st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cumulative emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from coal since the first year of available data, measured in tonnes.