Aruba vs Curacao: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from coal
Aruba
0 tonnes
in 1985
Curacao
0 tonnes
in 2011
Aruba rank
170th
Curacao rank
170th
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from coal over time
- Aruba
- Curacao
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Curacao, a difference of 0 tonnes.
Across all 60 years both countries report, Curacao has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 170th and Curacao ranks 170th of 179 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Curacao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 1930s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 1940s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 1950s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 1960s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 1970s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 1980s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from coal, Aruba or Curacao?
- Aruba, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Curacao as of 1985.
- What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from coal between Aruba and Curacao?
- 0 tonnes, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Curacao?
- 60 years are reported by both, from 1926 to 1985.
- How do Aruba and Curacao rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from coal?
- Aruba ranks 170th and Curacao ranks 170th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cumulative emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from coal since the first year of available data, measured in tonnes.