Barbados vs South Sudan: Cumulative co2 coal
Barbados
54,532
in 1989
South Sudan
105,542
in 2011
Barbados rank
157th
South Sudan rank
156th
Cumulative co2 coal over time
- Barbados
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 105,542 against 54,532 in Barbados, a difference of 51,010.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.9 times Barbados's.
Across all 40 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 157th and South Sudan ranks 156th of 179 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 20,097 | 54,289 | 34,192 | South Sudan |
| 1960s | 48,714 | 101,310 | 52,596 | South Sudan |
| 1970s | 54,532 | 105,432 | 50,900 | South Sudan |
| 1980s | 54,532 | 105,542 | 51,010 | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co2 coal, Barbados or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 105,542 against 54,532 in Barbados as of 2011.
- What is the difference in cumulative co2 coal between Barbados and South Sudan?
- 51,010, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and South Sudan?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 1989.
- How do Barbados and South Sudan rank globally for cumulative co2 coal?
- Barbados ranks 157th and South Sudan ranks 156th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Cumulative co2 coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.