Curacao vs Uganda: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from coal
Curacao
0 tonnes
in 2011
Uganda
0 tonnes
in 2024
Curacao rank
170th
Uganda rank
170th
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from coal over time
- Curacao
- Uganda
How they compare
Curacao currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Uganda, a difference of 0 tonnes.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Curacao ranks 170th and Uganda ranks 170th of 179 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 2010s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from coal, Curacao or Uganda?
- Curacao, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Uganda as of 2011.
- What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from coal between Curacao and Uganda?
- 0 tonnes, with Curacao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Uganda?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2011.
- How do Curacao and Uganda rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from coal?
- Curacao ranks 170th and Uganda ranks 170th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cumulative emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from coal since the first year of available data, measured in tonnes.