Ecuador vs Nicaragua: Cumulative co2 coal
Ecuador
562,066
in 1960
Nicaragua
324,819
in 1950
Ecuador rank
140th
Nicaragua rank
143rd
Cumulative co2 coal over time
- Ecuador
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 562,066 against 324,819 in Nicaragua, a difference of 237,247.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.7 times Nicaragua's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1892 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Ecuador ranks 140th and Nicaragua ranks 143rd of 179 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 5 and Nicaragua in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 2,780 | 115,078 | 112,298 | Nicaragua |
| 1900s | 39,670 | 177,299 | 137,630 | Nicaragua |
| 1910s | 346,602 | 231,093 | 115,509 | Ecuador |
| 1920s | 519,805 | 292,327 | 227,478 | Ecuador |
| 1930s | 549,937 | 321,114 | 228,823 | Ecuador |
| 1940s | 556,710 | 323,560 | 233,150 | Ecuador |
| 1950s | 560,153 | 324,819 | 235,334 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co2 coal, Ecuador or Nicaragua?
- Ecuador, at 562,066 against 324,819 in Nicaragua as of 1960.
- What is the difference in cumulative co2 coal between Ecuador and Nicaragua?
- 237,247, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Nicaragua?
- 59 years are reported by both, from 1892 to 1950.
- How do Ecuador and Nicaragua rank globally for cumulative co2 coal?
- Ecuador ranks 140th and Nicaragua ranks 143rd of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Cumulative co2 coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.