Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kazakhstan: Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, annual growth rate
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1.9 % change on previous year
in 2024
Kazakhstan
1.96 % change on previous year
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
147th
Kazakhstan rank
144th
Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, annual growth rate over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 1.96 % change on previous year against 1.9 % change on previous year in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.06 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 125 shared years of data; in 1891 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 147th and Kazakhstan ranks 144th of 215 countries.
Across the 14 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 10 and Kazakhstan in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 45.87 % change on previous year | 9.69 % change on previous year | 36.18 % change on previous year | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1900s | 15.88 % change on previous year | 8.03 % change on previous year | 7.85 % change on previous year | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1910s | 13 % change on previous year | 6.44 % change on previous year | 6.56 % change on previous year | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1920s | 14.31 % change on previous year | 2.4 % change on previous year | 11.91 % change on previous year | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1930s | 6.56 % change on previous year | 6.93 % change on previous year | 0.3764 % change on previous year | Kazakhstan |
| 1940s | 5.09 % change on previous year | 5.81 % change on previous year | 0.7195 % change on previous year | Kazakhstan |
| 1950s | 6.51 % change on previous year | 7.09 % change on previous year | 0.5863 % change on previous year | Kazakhstan |
| 1960s | 6.84 % change on previous year | 6.66 % change on previous year | 0.1823 % change on previous year | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1970s | 6.82 % change on previous year | 5.75 % change on previous year | 1.07 % change on previous year | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1980s | 5.27 % change on previous year | 4.45 % change on previous year | 0.8182 % change on previous year | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 1990s | 2.01 % change on previous year | 2.42 % change on previous year | 0.4137 % change on previous year | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 2.56 % change on previous year | 1.96 % change on previous year | 0.5987 % change on previous year | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 2.6 % change on previous year | 2.37 % change on previous year | 0.2345 % change on previous year | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 2.08 % change on previous year | 1.95 % change on previous year | 0.133 % change on previous year | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions by world region, annual growth rate, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 1.96 % change on previous year against 1.9 % change on previous year in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions by world region, annual growth rate between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kazakhstan?
- 0.06 % change on previous year, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kazakhstan?
- 125 years are reported by both, from 1891 to 2024.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kazakhstan rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions by world region, annual growth rate?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 147th and Kazakhstan ranks 144th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.