Iceland vs Mexico: Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, annual growth rate

Iceland
2.27 % change on previous year
in 2024
Mexico
2.14 % change on previous year
in 2024
Iceland rank
131st
Mexico rank
134th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, annual growth rate over time

  • Iceland
  • Mexico
020406080100185719402024

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 2.27 % change on previous year against 2.14 % change on previous year in Mexico, a difference of 0.13 % change on previous year.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 85 shared years of data; in 1937 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 131st and Mexico ranks 134th of 215 countries.

Across the 10 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 5 and Mexico in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Mexico Difference Ahead
1930s 83.33 % change on previous year 2.56 % change on previous year 80.78 % change on previous year Iceland
1940s 32.5 % change on previous year 2.07 % change on previous year 30.43 % change on previous year Iceland
1950s 10.53 % change on previous year 2.84 % change on previous year 7.69 % change on previous year Iceland
1960s 6.82 % change on previous year 3.8 % change on previous year 3.02 % change on previous year Iceland
1970s 4.91 % change on previous year 5.27 % change on previous year 0.3639 % change on previous year Mexico
1980s 3.38 % change on previous year 5.46 % change on previous year 2.09 % change on previous year Mexico
1990s 3.37 % change on previous year 4.07 % change on previous year 0.6928 % change on previous year Mexico
2000s 3.2 % change on previous year 3.56 % change on previous year 0.3617 % change on previous year Mexico
2010s 2.65 % change on previous year 2.81 % change on previous year 0.1573 % change on previous year Mexico
2020s 2.21 % change on previous year 2.18 % change on previous year 0.0266 % change on previous year Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions by world region, annual growth rate, Iceland or Mexico?
Iceland, at 2.27 % change on previous year against 2.14 % change on previous year in Mexico as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions by world region, annual growth rate between Iceland and Mexico?
0.13 % change on previous year, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mexico?
85 years are reported by both, from 1937 to 2024.
How do Iceland and Mexico rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions by world region, annual growth rate?
Iceland ranks 131st and Mexico ranks 134th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Mexico: Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-by-world-region-annual-growth-rate/iceland/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-by-world-region-annual-growth-rate/iceland/mexico/">Iceland vs Mexico: Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 22,547 data points, 1751–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.