Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tunisia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled

Bosnia and Herzegovina
1.04 billion tonnes
in 2024
Tunisia
1.07 billion tonnes
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
82nd
Tunisia rank
81st

Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Tunisia
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B188519542024

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 1.07 billion tonnes against 1.04 billion tonnes in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 22.70 million tonnes.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 95 shared years of data; in 1919 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 82nd and Tunisia ranks 81st of 215 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Tunisia Difference Ahead
1910s 3.88 million tonnes 95,264 tonnes 3.79 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
1920s 4.82 million tonnes 120,912 tonnes 4.70 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
1930s 23.86 million tonnes 219,649 tonnes 23.64 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
1940s 31.95 million tonnes 886,388 tonnes 31.07 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
1950s 56.16 million tonnes 9.19 million tonnes 46.97 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
1960s 109.44 million tonnes 28.19 million tonnes 81.25 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
1970s 212.35 million tonnes 69.47 million tonnes 142.88 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
1980s 376.62 million tonnes 161.69 million tonnes 214.94 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
1990s 528.27 million tonnes 310.23 million tonnes 218.05 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 648.15 million tonnes 506.96 million tonnes 141.19 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 846.10 million tonnes 772.90 million tonnes 73.20 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 1.00 billion tonnes 1.00 billion tonnes 1.07 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 1.07 billion tonnes against 1.04 billion tonnes in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tunisia?
22.70 million tonnes, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tunisia?
95 years are reported by both, from 1919 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tunisia rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 82nd and Tunisia ranks 81st of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tunisia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-by-world-region-gaps-filled/bosnia-and-herzegovina/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-by-world-region-gaps-filled/bosnia-and-herzegovina/tunisia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tunisia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 23,492 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region with 84 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.