Cuba vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled

Cuba
1.81 billion tonnes
in 2024
Trinidad and Tobago
1.71 billion tonnes
in 2024
Cuba rank
71st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
73rd

Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled over time

  • Cuba
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B185619402024

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 1.81 billion tonnes against 1.71 billion tonnes in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 103.14 million tonnes.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 116 shared years of data; in 1909 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 71st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 73rd of 215 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 11 and Trinidad and Tobago in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1900s 43.43 million tonnes 25,648 tonnes 43.40 million tonnes Cuba
1910s 60.35 million tonnes 1.40 million tonnes 58.95 million tonnes Cuba
1920s 86.26 million tonnes 11.41 million tonnes 74.85 million tonnes Cuba
1930s 98.00 million tonnes 46.52 million tonnes 51.48 million tonnes Cuba
1940s 104.93 million tonnes 136.08 million tonnes 31.14 million tonnes Trinidad and Tobago
1950s 146.55 million tonnes 204.45 million tonnes 57.90 million tonnes Trinidad and Tobago
1960s 274.45 million tonnes 240.48 million tonnes 33.97 million tonnes Cuba
1970s 468.68 million tonnes 315.63 million tonnes 153.05 million tonnes Cuba
1980s 774.25 million tonnes 474.25 million tonnes 300.00 million tonnes Cuba
1990s 1.06 billion tonnes 647.27 million tonnes 412.96 million tonnes Cuba
2000s 1.31 billion tonnes 908.86 million tonnes 396.93 million tonnes Cuba
2010s 1.58 billion tonnes 1.34 billion tonnes 242.25 million tonnes Cuba
2020s 1.77 billion tonnes 1.64 billion tonnes 126.95 million tonnes Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled, Cuba or Trinidad and Tobago?
Cuba, at 1.81 billion tonnes against 1.71 billion tonnes in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled between Cuba and Trinidad and Tobago?
103.14 million tonnes, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Trinidad and Tobago?
116 years are reported by both, from 1909 to 2024.
How do Cuba and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled?
Cuba ranks 71st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 73rd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-by-world-region-gaps-filled/cuba/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-by-world-region-gaps-filled/cuba/trinidad-and-tobago/">Cuba vs Trinidad and Tobago: Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 23,492 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region with 84 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.