Serbia vs Turkmenistan: Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled

Serbia
2.92 billion tonnes
in 2024
Turkmenistan
2.74 billion tonnes
in 2024
Serbia rank
56th
Turkmenistan rank
59th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled over time

  • Serbia
  • Turkmenistan
01.0B2.0B3.0B183019272024

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 2.92 billion tonnes against 2.74 billion tonnes in Turkmenistan, a difference of 183.26 million tonnes.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Turkmenistan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 131 shared years of data; in 1885 it was Turkmenistan ahead.

Serbia ranks 56th and Turkmenistan ranks 59th of 215 countries.

Across the 15 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 11 and Turkmenistan in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1880s 13,049 tonnes 1.63 million tonnes 1.62 million tonnes Turkmenistan
1890s 577,099 tonnes 4.07 million tonnes 3.49 million tonnes Turkmenistan
1900s 3.73 million tonnes 9.62 million tonnes 5.89 million tonnes Turkmenistan
1910s 8.65 million tonnes 16.26 million tonnes 7.61 million tonnes Turkmenistan
1920s 26.17 million tonnes 23.15 million tonnes 3.02 million tonnes Serbia
1930s 63.59 million tonnes 37.87 million tonnes 25.72 million tonnes Serbia
1940s 92.48 million tonnes 68.86 million tonnes 23.62 million tonnes Serbia
1950s 162.60 million tonnes 126.58 million tonnes 36.02 million tonnes Serbia
1960s 316.90 million tonnes 248.29 million tonnes 68.61 million tonnes Serbia
1970s 614.84 million tonnes 451.65 million tonnes 163.19 million tonnes Serbia
1980s 1.09 billion tonnes 741.52 million tonnes 347.99 million tonnes Serbia
1990s 1.59 billion tonnes 1.07 billion tonnes 511.31 million tonnes Serbia
2000s 2.04 billion tonnes 1.45 billion tonnes 582.41 million tonnes Serbia
2010s 2.51 billion tonnes 2.03 billion tonnes 481.41 million tonnes Serbia
2020s 2.84 billion tonnes 2.56 billion tonnes 278.56 million tonnes Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled, Serbia or Turkmenistan?
Serbia, at 2.92 billion tonnes against 2.74 billion tonnes in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled between Serbia and Turkmenistan?
183.26 million tonnes, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Turkmenistan?
131 years are reported by both, from 1885 to 2024.
How do Serbia and Turkmenistan rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled?
Serbia ranks 56th and Turkmenistan ranks 59th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Turkmenistan: Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-by-world-region-gaps-filled/serbia/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-by-world-region-gaps-filled/serbia/turkmenistan/">Serbia vs Turkmenistan: Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 23,492 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions by world region with 84 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.