Australia vs Kazakhstan: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled

Australia
345.17 million tonnes
in 2024
Kazakhstan
375.06 million tonnes
in 2024
Australia rank
17th
Kazakhstan rank
15th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled over time

  • Australia
  • Kazakhstan
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M175018872024

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 375.06 million tonnes against 345.17 million tonnes in Australia, a difference of 29.90 million tonnes.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 17th and Kazakhstan ranks 15th of 215 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1830s 0 tonnes 0 tonnes 0 tonnes —
1850s 0 tonnes 0 tonnes 0 tonnes —
1980s 1.39 million tonnes 23.76 million tonnes 22.37 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1990s 40.89 million tonnes 61.60 million tonnes 20.71 million tonnes Kazakhstan
2000s 112.88 million tonnes 139.47 million tonnes 26.58 million tonnes Kazakhstan
2010s 199.46 million tonnes 268.76 million tonnes 69.29 million tonnes Kazakhstan
2020s 312.50 million tonnes 355.10 million tonnes 42.61 million tonnes Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled, Australia or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 375.06 million tonnes against 345.17 million tonnes in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled between Australia and Kazakhstan?
29.90 million tonnes, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kazakhstan?
52 years are reported by both, from 1830 to 2024.
How do Australia and Kazakhstan rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled?
Australia ranks 17th and Kazakhstan ranks 15th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Kazakhstan: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-flaring-gaps-filled/australia/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-flaring-gaps-filled/australia/kazakhstan/">Australia vs Kazakhstan: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,556 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring with 73 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.