Congo vs Ecuador: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled

Congo
95.52 million tonnes
in 2024
Ecuador
88.28 million tonnes
in 2024
Congo rank
37th
Ecuador rank
38th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled over time

  • Congo
  • Ecuador
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M195019872024

How they compare

Congo currently reports 95.52 million tonnes against 88.28 million tonnes in Ecuador, a difference of 7.25 million tonnes.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 51 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Ecuador ahead.

Congo ranks 37th and Ecuador ranks 38th of 215 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Ecuador Difference Ahead
1970s 2.38 million tonnes 3.38 million tonnes 1.00 million tonnes Ecuador
1980s 5.00 million tonnes 11.22 million tonnes 6.22 million tonnes Ecuador
1990s 14.08 million tonnes 30.32 million tonnes 16.24 million tonnes Ecuador
2000s 39.17 million tonnes 46.76 million tonnes 7.59 million tonnes Ecuador
2010s 67.57 million tonnes 67.31 million tonnes 252,760 tonnes Congo
2020s 88.79 million tonnes 82.58 million tonnes 6.20 million tonnes Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled, Congo or Ecuador?
Congo, at 95.52 million tonnes against 88.28 million tonnes in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled between Congo and Ecuador?
7.25 million tonnes, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Ecuador?
51 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Congo and Ecuador rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled?
Congo ranks 37th and Ecuador ranks 38th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Ecuador: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-flaring-gaps-filled/congo-rep/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-flaring-gaps-filled/congo-rep/ecuador/">Congo vs Ecuador: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,556 data points, 1750–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring with 73 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.