Cuba vs Serbia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled
Cuba
1.05 million tonnes
in 2024
Serbia
1.06 million tonnes
in 2024
Cuba rank
99th
Serbia rank
98th
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled over time
- Cuba
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 1.06 million tonnes against 1.05 million tonnes in Cuba, a difference of 2,010 tonnes.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 99th and Serbia ranks 98th of 215 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 tonnes | 954,523 tonnes | 954,523 tonnes | Serbia |
| 2000s | 0 tonnes | 954,523 tonnes | 954,523 tonnes | Serbia |
| 2010s | 368,118 tonnes | 1.02 million tonnes | 647,215 tonnes | Serbia |
| 2020s | 864,844 tonnes | 1.06 million tonnes | 191,014 tonnes | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled, Cuba or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 1.06 million tonnes against 1.05 million tonnes in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled between Cuba and Serbia?
- 2,010 tonnes, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Serbia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Serbia rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled?
- Cuba ranks 99th and Serbia ranks 98th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring with 73 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.