Japan vs Sweden: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled
Japan
17.19 million tonnes
in 2024
Sweden
17.12 million tonnes
in 2024
Japan rank
59th
Sweden rank
60th
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled over time
- Japan
- Sweden
How they compare
Japan currently reports 17.19 million tonnes against 17.12 million tonnes in Sweden, a difference of 72,500 tonnes.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 59th and Sweden ranks 60th of 215 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.02 million tonnes | 1.77 million tonnes | 1.25 million tonnes | Japan |
| 2000s | 8.17 million tonnes | 5.86 million tonnes | 2.31 million tonnes | Japan |
| 2010s | 13.36 million tonnes | 13.32 million tonnes | 36,276 tonnes | Japan |
| 2020s | 16.51 million tonnes | 17.09 million tonnes | 583,880 tonnes | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled, Japan or Sweden?
- Japan, at 17.19 million tonnes against 17.12 million tonnes in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled between Japan and Sweden?
- 72,500 tonnes, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Sweden rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled?
- Japan ranks 59th and Sweden ranks 60th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring with 73 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.