Latvia vs Mozambique: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled
Latvia
1.56 million tonnes
in 2024
Mozambique
1.58 million tonnes
in 2024
Latvia rank
93rd
Mozambique rank
92nd
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled over time
- Latvia
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 1.58 million tonnes against 1.56 million tonnes in Latvia, a difference of 19,270 tonnes.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 93rd and Mozambique ranks 92nd of 215 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.56 million tonnes | 0 tonnes | 1.56 million tonnes | Latvia |
| 2000s | 1.56 million tonnes | 0 tonnes | 1.56 million tonnes | Latvia |
| 2010s | 1.56 million tonnes | 92,061 tonnes | 1.47 million tonnes | Latvia |
| 2020s | 1.56 million tonnes | 858,595 tonnes | 699,705 tonnes | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled, Latvia or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 1.58 million tonnes against 1.56 million tonnes in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled between Latvia and Mozambique?
- 19,270 tonnes, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mozambique?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Mozambique rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled?
- Latvia ranks 93rd and Mozambique ranks 92nd of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring with 73 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.