Brazil vs Djibouti: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate
Brazil
1.33 % change on previous year
in 2024
Djibouti
1.35 % change on previous year
in 2024
Brazil rank
25th
Djibouti rank
22nd
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate over time
- Brazil
- Djibouti
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 1.35 % change on previous year against 1.33 % change on previous year in Brazil, a difference of 0.02 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 174 shared years of data; in 1851 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 25th and Djibouti ranks 22nd of 188 countries.
Across the 18 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 13 and Djibouti in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Djibouti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 31.93 % change on previous year | 28.81 % change on previous year | 3.12 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1860s | 7.56 % change on previous year | 6.5 % change on previous year | 1.05 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1870s | 5.56 % change on previous year | 3.96 % change on previous year | 1.6 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1880s | 6.3 % change on previous year | 2.73 % change on previous year | 3.57 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1890s | 4.25 % change on previous year | 2.17 % change on previous year | 2.08 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1900s | 4.21 % change on previous year | 1.91 % change on previous year | 2.29 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1910s | 4.64 % change on previous year | 1.11 % change on previous year | 3.53 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1920s | 4.07 % change on previous year | 1.11 % change on previous year | 2.97 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1930s | 1.62 % change on previous year | 1.35 % change on previous year | 0.2728 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1940s | 2.56 % change on previous year | 1.32 % change on previous year | 1.24 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1950s | 3.64 % change on previous year | 1.22 % change on previous year | 2.42 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1960s | 3.51 % change on previous year | 1.72 % change on previous year | 1.79 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1970s | 2.84 % change on previous year | 2.9 % change on previous year | 0.0645 % change on previous year | Djibouti |
| 1980s | 2.72 % change on previous year | 3.33 % change on previous year | 0.6076 % change on previous year | Djibouti |
| 1990s | 2.52 % change on previous year | 3.11 % change on previous year | 0.593 % change on previous year | Djibouti |
| 2000s | 2.12 % change on previous year | 1.84 % change on previous year | 0.2857 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 2010s | 1.13 % change on previous year | 1.49 % change on previous year | 0.3573 % change on previous year | Djibouti |
| 2020s | 1.33 % change on previous year | 1.35 % change on previous year | 0.0176 % change on previous year | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate, Brazil or Djibouti?
- Djibouti, at 1.35 % change on previous year against 1.33 % change on previous year in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate between Brazil and Djibouti?
- 0.02 % change on previous year, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Djibouti?
- 174 years are reported by both, from 1851 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Djibouti rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate?
- Brazil ranks 25th and Djibouti ranks 22nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.