Brazil vs Namibia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate
Brazil
1.33 % change on previous year
in 2024
Namibia
1.31 % change on previous year
in 2024
Brazil rank
25th
Namibia rank
26th
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate over time
- Brazil
- Namibia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 1.33 % change on previous year against 1.31 % change on previous year in Namibia, a difference of 0.02 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 174 shared years of data; in 1851 it was Namibia ahead.
Brazil ranks 25th and Namibia ranks 26th of 188 countries.
Across the 18 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 11 and Namibia in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 31.93 % change on previous year | 57.5 % change on previous year | 25.57 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 1860s | 7.56 % change on previous year | 11.04 % change on previous year | 3.49 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 1870s | 5.56 % change on previous year | 5.9 % change on previous year | 0.3378 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 1880s | 6.3 % change on previous year | 4.17 % change on previous year | 2.12 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1890s | 4.25 % change on previous year | 2.97 % change on previous year | 1.28 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1900s | 4.21 % change on previous year | 3.27 % change on previous year | 0.9359 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1910s | 4.64 % change on previous year | 3.04 % change on previous year | 1.6 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1920s | 4.07 % change on previous year | 3.76 % change on previous year | 0.3121 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1930s | 1.62 % change on previous year | 3.7 % change on previous year | 2.08 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 1940s | 2.56 % change on previous year | 3.53 % change on previous year | 0.9713 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 1950s | 3.64 % change on previous year | 3.04 % change on previous year | 0.5949 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1960s | 3.51 % change on previous year | 1.95 % change on previous year | 1.56 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1970s | 2.84 % change on previous year | 1.01 % change on previous year | 1.83 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1980s | 2.72 % change on previous year | 0.8676 % change on previous year | 1.85 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 1990s | 2.52 % change on previous year | 1.73 % change on previous year | 0.786 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 2000s | 2.12 % change on previous year | 0.9785 % change on previous year | 1.15 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 2010s | 1.13 % change on previous year | 1.21 % change on previous year | 0.0774 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 2020s | 1.33 % change on previous year | 1.62 % change on previous year | 0.2897 % change on previous year | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate, Brazil or Namibia?
- Brazil, at 1.33 % change on previous year against 1.31 % change on previous year in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate between Brazil and Namibia?
- 0.02 % change on previous year, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Namibia?
- 174 years are reported by both, from 1851 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Namibia rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate?
- Brazil ranks 25th and Namibia ranks 26th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.