Chad vs Laos: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate
Chad
0.5361 % change on previous year
in 2024
Laos
0.5913 % change on previous year
in 2024
Chad rank
61st
Laos rank
58th
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate over time
- Chad
- Laos
How they compare
Laos currently reports 0.5913 % change on previous year against 0.5361 % change on previous year in Chad, a difference of 0.0552 % change on previous year.
That makes Laos's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 174 shared years of data; in 1851 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 61st and Laos ranks 58th of 188 countries.
Across the 18 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 2 and Laos in 16.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 46.74 % change on previous year | 24.86 % change on previous year | 21.88 % change on previous year | Chad |
| 1860s | 3.49 % change on previous year | 5.24 % change on previous year | 1.75 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 1870s | 0.7039 % change on previous year | 5.53 % change on previous year | 4.82 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 1880s | 0.2766 % change on previous year | 5.95 % change on previous year | 5.67 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 1890s | -0.3368 % change on previous year | 4.04 % change on previous year | 4.37 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 1900s | -0.6489 % change on previous year | 1.77 % change on previous year | 2.42 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 1910s | -0.6691 % change on previous year | 1.73 % change on previous year | 2.4 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 1920s | 0.5362 % change on previous year | 3.1 % change on previous year | 2.56 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 1930s | 1.25 % change on previous year | 3.94 % change on previous year | 2.68 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 1940s | 1.7 % change on previous year | 2.56 % change on previous year | 0.8655 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 1950s | 1.98 % change on previous year | 3.31 % change on previous year | 1.34 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 1960s | 1 % change on previous year | 1.93 % change on previous year | 0.9229 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 1970s | 0.9121 % change on previous year | 1.68 % change on previous year | 0.7662 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 1980s | 0.628 % change on previous year | 1.18 % change on previous year | 0.5545 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 1990s | 1.07 % change on previous year | 1.29 % change on previous year | 0.2238 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 2000s | 1.45 % change on previous year | 2.64 % change on previous year | 1.19 % change on previous year | Laos |
| 2010s | 2.24 % change on previous year | 1.9 % change on previous year | 0.3402 % change on previous year | Chad |
| 2020s | 0.6376 % change on previous year | 0.7332 % change on previous year | 0.0955 % change on previous year | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate, Chad or Laos?
- Laos, at 0.5913 % change on previous year against 0.5361 % change on previous year in Chad as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate between Chad and Laos?
- 0.0552 % change on previous year, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Laos?
- 174 years are reported by both, from 1851 to 2024.
- How do Chad and Laos rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate?
- Chad ranks 61st and Laos ranks 58th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.