Iran vs Zambia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate
Iran
1.02 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zambia
0.9852 % change on previous year
in 2024
Iran rank
31st
Zambia rank
34th
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate over time
- Iran
- Zambia
How they compare
Iran currently reports 1.02 % change on previous year against 0.9852 % change on previous year in Zambia, a difference of 0.0348 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 174 shared years of data; in 1851 it was Iran ahead.
Iran ranks 31st and Zambia ranks 34th of 188 countries.
Across the 18 decades both report, Iran averaged higher in 7 and Zambia in 11.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 31.42 % change on previous year | 28.26 % change on previous year | 3.15 % change on previous year | Iran |
| 1860s | 7.16 % change on previous year | 6.25 % change on previous year | 0.9113 % change on previous year | Iran |
| 1870s | 8.31 % change on previous year | 3.72 % change on previous year | 4.59 % change on previous year | Iran |
| 1880s | 5.57 % change on previous year | 3.24 % change on previous year | 2.33 % change on previous year | Iran |
| 1890s | 3.39 % change on previous year | 2.14 % change on previous year | 1.25 % change on previous year | Iran |
| 1900s | 2.41 % change on previous year | 1.28 % change on previous year | 1.13 % change on previous year | Iran |
| 1910s | 1.88 % change on previous year | 0.8653 % change on previous year | 1.01 % change on previous year | Iran |
| 1920s | 1.48 % change on previous year | 3.12 % change on previous year | 1.64 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1930s | 1.15 % change on previous year | 3.25 % change on previous year | 2.1 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1940s | 0.9037 % change on previous year | 3.42 % change on previous year | 2.52 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1950s | 2.63 % change on previous year | 3.08 % change on previous year | 0.4507 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1960s | 1.61 % change on previous year | 2.16 % change on previous year | 0.5485 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1970s | 0.9234 % change on previous year | 1.48 % change on previous year | 0.552 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1980s | 0.691 % change on previous year | 1.22 % change on previous year | 0.5302 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 1990s | 0.6669 % change on previous year | 1.37 % change on previous year | 0.703 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 2000s | -0.1157 % change on previous year | 1.87 % change on previous year | 1.99 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 2010s | -0.5097 % change on previous year | 1.69 % change on previous year | 2.2 % change on previous year | Zambia |
| 2020s | 0.5881 % change on previous year | 1.05 % change on previous year | 0.4634 % change on previous year | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate, Iran or Zambia?
- Iran, at 1.02 % change on previous year against 0.9852 % change on previous year in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate between Iran and Zambia?
- 0.0348 % change on previous year, with Iran ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Zambia?
- 174 years are reported by both, from 1851 to 2024.
- How do Iran and Zambia rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate?
- Iran ranks 31st and Zambia ranks 34th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.