Malawi vs Norway: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate
Malawi
0.75 % change on previous year
in 2024
Norway
0.745 % change on previous year
in 2024
Malawi rank
43rd
Norway rank
45th
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate over time
- Malawi
- Norway
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0.75 % change on previous year against 0.745 % change on previous year in Norway, a difference of 0.005 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 174 shared years of data; in 1851 it was Norway ahead.
Malawi ranks 43rd and Norway ranks 45th of 188 countries.
Across the 18 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 11 and Norway in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 19.7 % change on previous year | 31.39 % change on previous year | 11.68 % change on previous year | Norway |
| 1860s | 0.8479 % change on previous year | 6.87 % change on previous year | 6.03 % change on previous year | Norway |
| 1870s | 0.2266 % change on previous year | 3.95 % change on previous year | 3.72 % change on previous year | Norway |
| 1880s | 2.23 % change on previous year | 2.77 % change on previous year | 0.5371 % change on previous year | Norway |
| 1890s | -2.99 % change on previous year | 2.22 % change on previous year | 5.2 % change on previous year | Norway |
| 1900s | -83.95 % change on previous year | 1.69 % change on previous year | 85.63 % change on previous year | Norway |
| 1910s | -25.39 % change on previous year | 1.45 % change on previous year | 26.83 % change on previous year | Norway |
| 1920s | 30.33 % change on previous year | 1.07 % change on previous year | 29.26 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 1930s | 63.41 % change on previous year | 0.7335 % change on previous year | 62.68 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 1940s | 9.57 % change on previous year | 0.4572 % change on previous year | 9.12 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 1950s | 8.03 % change on previous year | -0.1372 % change on previous year | 8.17 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 1960s | 7.35 % change on previous year | -1.01 % change on previous year | 8.36 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 1970s | 2.61 % change on previous year | -0.7167 % change on previous year | 3.32 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 1980s | 1.28 % change on previous year | -0.1551 % change on previous year | 1.44 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 1990s | 1.77 % change on previous year | 0.3543 % change on previous year | 1.41 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 2000s | 2.13 % change on previous year | 0.2984 % change on previous year | 1.83 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 2010s | 1.08 % change on previous year | 0.5169 % change on previous year | 0.5585 % change on previous year | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0.8022 % change on previous year | 0.7214 % change on previous year | 0.0808 % change on previous year | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate, Malawi or Norway?
- Malawi, at 0.75 % change on previous year against 0.745 % change on previous year in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate between Malawi and Norway?
- 0.005 % change on previous year, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Norway?
- 174 years are reported by both, from 1851 to 2024.
- How do Malawi and Norway rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate?
- Malawi ranks 43rd and Norway ranks 45th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.