Congo vs Sao Tome and Principe: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, annual growth rate

Congo
3.65 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
3.66 % change on previous year
in 2024
Congo rank
65th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
64th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, annual growth rate over time

  • Congo
  • Sao Tome and Principe
050100150195119872024

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 3.66 % change on previous year against 3.65 % change on previous year in Congo, a difference of 0.01 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 73 shared years of data; in 1952 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Congo ranks 65th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 64th of 215 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1950s 30.02 % change on previous year 40.98 % change on previous year 10.96 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
1960s 11.79 % change on previous year 12.46 % change on previous year 0.6662 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 5.97 % change on previous year 8.65 % change on previous year 2.68 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 8 % change on previous year 8.71 % change on previous year 0.7036 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 5.1 % change on previous year 4.47 % change on previous year 0.6329 % change on previous year Congo
2000s 2.79 % change on previous year 4.32 % change on previous year 1.52 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 4.57 % change on previous year 4.91 % change on previous year 0.3357 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 3.67 % change on previous year 3.92 % change on previous year 0.2545 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from oil, annual growth rate, Congo or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 3.66 % change on previous year against 3.65 % change on previous year in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from oil, annual growth rate between Congo and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.01 % change on previous year, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sao Tome and Principe?
73 years are reported by both, from 1952 to 2024.
How do Congo and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from oil, annual growth rate?
Congo ranks 65th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 64th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Sao Tome and Principe: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-oil-annual-growth-rate/congo-rep/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-from-oil-annual-growth-rate/congo-rep/sao-tome-and-principe/">Congo vs Sao Tome and Principe: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 19,020 data points, 1856–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.