Aruba vs Central African Republic: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring
Aruba
0 tonnes
in 2024
Central African Republic
0 tonnes
in 2024
Aruba rank
121st
Central African Republic rank
121st
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring over time
- Aruba
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Central African Republic, a difference of 0 tonnes.
Across all 40 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 121st and Central African Republic ranks 121st of 215 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 1990s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 2000s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 2010s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 2020s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from flaring, Aruba or Central African Republic?
- Aruba, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Central African Republic as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from flaring between Aruba and Central African Republic?
- 0 tonnes, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Central African Republic?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Central African Republic rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from flaring?
- Aruba ranks 121st and Central African Republic ranks 121st of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cumulative emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from flaring since the first year of available data, measured in tonnes.