New Caledonia vs Sri Lanka: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring
New Caledonia
0 tonnes
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 tonnes
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
121st
Sri Lanka rank
121st
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring over time
- New Caledonia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 tonnes.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
New Caledonia ranks 121st and Sri Lanka ranks 121st of 215 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 2000s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 2010s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
| 2020s | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | 0 tonnes | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from flaring, New Caledonia or Sri Lanka?
- New Caledonia, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from flaring between New Caledonia and Sri Lanka?
- 0 tonnes, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Sri Lanka?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
- How do New Caledonia and Sri Lanka rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from flaring?
- New Caledonia ranks 121st and Sri Lanka ranks 121st of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cumulative emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from flaring since the first year of available data, measured in tonnes.