Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zimbabwe: Cumulative co2 flaring
Turks and Caicos Islands
0
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
121st
Zimbabwe rank
121st
Cumulative co2 flaring over time
- Turks and Caicos Islands
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0 against 0 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 121st and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 210 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Turks and Caicos Islands | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co2 flaring, Turks and Caicos Islands or Zimbabwe?
- Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0 against 0 in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cumulative co2 flaring between Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
- How do Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe rank globally for cumulative co2 flaring?
- Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 121st and Zimbabwe ranks 121st of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Cumulative co2 flaring. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.