Georgia vs Namibia: Cumulative co2 including land
Georgia
233.48 million
in 2024
Namibia
219.85 million
in 2024
Georgia rank
153rd
Namibia rank
155th
Cumulative co2 including land over time
- Georgia
- Namibia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 233.48 million against 219.85 million in Namibia, a difference of 13.63 million.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 153rd and Namibia ranks 155th of 194 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 262.57 million | 30.48 million | 232.09 million | Georgia |
| 2000s | 239.54 million | 80.06 million | 159.47 million | Georgia |
| 2010s | 213.28 million | 142.03 million | 71.24 million | Georgia |
| 2020s | 224.02 million | 201.89 million | 22.13 million | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co2 including land, Georgia or Namibia?
- Georgia, at 233.48 million against 219.85 million in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cumulative co2 including land between Georgia and Namibia?
- 13.63 million, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Namibia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Namibia rank globally for cumulative co2 including land?
- Georgia ranks 153rd and Namibia ranks 155th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Cumulative co2 including land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.