Sweden vs Tanzania: Cumulative co2 including land
Sweden
7.56 billion
in 2024
Tanzania
7.59 billion
in 2024
Sweden rank
46th
Tanzania rank
45th
Cumulative co2 including land over time
- Sweden
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 7.59 billion against 7.56 billion in Sweden, a difference of 37.59 million.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Sweden ahead.
Sweden ranks 46th and Tanzania ranks 45th of 194 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 4.13 billion | 440.07 million | 3.69 billion | Sweden |
| 1960s | 4.45 billion | 1.47 billion | 2.98 billion | Sweden |
| 1970s | 4.99 billion | 2.52 billion | 2.47 billion | Sweden |
| 1980s | 5.55 billion | 3.47 billion | 2.08 billion | Sweden |
| 1990s | 6.03 billion | 4.17 billion | 1.87 billion | Sweden |
| 2000s | 6.58 billion | 5.10 billion | 1.47 billion | Sweden |
| 2010s | 7.11 billion | 6.58 billion | 526.15 million | Sweden |
| 2020s | 7.46 billion | 7.41 billion | 55.05 million | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co2 including land, Sweden or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 7.59 billion against 7.56 billion in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cumulative co2 including land between Sweden and Tanzania?
- 37.59 million, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Tanzania?
- 75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
- How do Sweden and Tanzania rank globally for cumulative co2 including land?
- Sweden ranks 46th and Tanzania ranks 45th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Cumulative co2 including land. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.