New Zealand vs Timor-Leste: Direct economic loss resulting from damaged or destroyed critical
New Zealand
0
in 2024
Timor-Leste
0
in 2024
New Zealand rank
70th
Timor-Leste rank
70th
Direct economic loss resulting from damaged or destroyed critical over time
- New Zealand
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0 against 0 in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
New Zealand ranks 70th and Timor-Leste ranks 70th of 102 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 | 242,781 | 242,781 | Timor-Leste |
| 2020s | 1.23 billion | 0 | 1.23 billion | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher direct economic loss resulting from damaged or destroyed critical, New Zealand or Timor-Leste?
- New Zealand, at 0 against 0 in Timor-Leste as of 2024.
- What is the difference in direct economic loss resulting from damaged or destroyed critical between New Zealand and Timor-Leste?
- 0, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Timor-Leste?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and Timor-Leste rank globally for direct economic loss resulting from damaged or destroyed critical?
- New Zealand ranks 70th and Timor-Leste ranks 70th of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Direct economic loss resulting from damaged or destroyed critical infrastructure attributed to disasters (current United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.