Serbia vs Timor-Leste: Direct economic loss resulting from damaged or destroyed critical
Serbia
0
in 2024
Timor-Leste
0
in 2024
Serbia rank
70th
Timor-Leste rank
70th
Direct economic loss resulting from damaged or destroyed critical over time
- Serbia
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0 against 0 in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 70th and Timor-Leste ranks 70th of 102 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 164,292 | 220,814 | 56,522 | Timor-Leste |
| 2020s | 169,889 | 0 | 169,889 | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher direct economic loss resulting from damaged or destroyed critical, Serbia or Timor-Leste?
- Serbia, at 0 against 0 in Timor-Leste as of 2024.
- What is the difference in direct economic loss resulting from damaged or destroyed critical between Serbia and Timor-Leste?
- 0, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Timor-Leste?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Serbia and Timor-Leste rank globally for direct economic loss resulting from damaged or destroyed critical?
- Serbia ranks 70th and Timor-Leste ranks 70th of 102 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Direct economic loss resulting from damaged or destroyed critical infrastructure attributed to disasters (current United States dollars). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.