Aruba vs Libya: Drained organic soils — Area — FAO TIER 1
Aruba
0 ha
in 2024
Libya
0 ha
in 2024
Aruba rank
113th
Libya rank
113th
Drained organic soils — Area — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Aruba
- Libya
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Libya, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 113th and Libya ranks 113th of 238 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher drained organic soils — area — fao tier 1, Aruba or Libya?
- Aruba, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in drained organic soils — area — fao tier 1 between Aruba and Libya?
- 0 ha, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Libya?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Libya rank globally for drained organic soils — area — fao tier 1?
- Aruba ranks 113th and Libya ranks 113th of 238 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Drained organic soils — Area — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from drained organic soils consists of nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from the mineralization and oxidation of organic matter in organic soils that are drained for agricultural activities.