Comoros, Union of the vs Zimbabwe: Drained organic soils β Area
Comoros, Union of the
0 ha
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0 ha
in 2024
Comoros, Union of the rank
105th
Zimbabwe rank
105th
Drained organic soils β Area over time
- Comoros, Union of the
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Comoros, Union of the currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Comoros, Union of the ranks 105th and Zimbabwe ranks 105th of 216 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros, Union of the | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | β |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | β |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | β |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher drained organic soils β area, Comoros, Union of the or Zimbabwe?
- Comoros, Union of the, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in drained organic soils β area between Comoros, Union of the and Zimbabwe?
- 0 ha, with Comoros, Union of the ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros, Union of the and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Comoros, Union of the and Zimbabwe rank globally for drained organic soils β area?
- Comoros, Union of the ranks 105th and Zimbabwe ranks 105th of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Drained organic soils β Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from drained organic soils consists of nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from the mineralization and oxidation of organic matter in organic soils that are drained for agricultural activities.