Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Drained organic soils — Area
Mauritius
0 ha
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0 ha
in 2024
Mauritius rank
105th
Zimbabwe rank
105th
Drained organic soils — Area over time
- Mauritius
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 105th and Zimbabwe ranks 105th of 216 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher drained organic soils — area, Mauritius or Zimbabwe?
- Mauritius, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in drained organic soils — area between Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
- 0 ha, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Zimbabwe rank globally for drained organic soils — area?
- Mauritius ranks 105th and Zimbabwe ranks 105th of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Drained organic soils — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from drained organic soils consists of nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from the mineralization and oxidation of organic matter in organic soils that are drained for agricultural activities.