Pitcairn vs Tonga: Drained organic soils — Area
Pitcairn
0 ha
in 2024
Tonga
0 ha
in 2024
Pitcairn rank
105th
Tonga rank
105th
Drained organic soils — Area over time
- Pitcairn
- Tonga
How they compare
Pitcairn currently reports 0 ha against 0 ha in Tonga, a difference of 0 ha.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.
Pitcairn ranks 105th and Tonga ranks 105th of 216 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pitcairn | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2000s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2010s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
| 2020s | 0 ha | 0 ha | 0 ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher drained organic soils — area, Pitcairn or Tonga?
- Pitcairn, at 0 ha against 0 ha in Tonga as of 2024.
- What is the difference in drained organic soils — area between Pitcairn and Tonga?
- 0 ha, with Pitcairn ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pitcairn and Tonga?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Pitcairn and Tonga rank globally for drained organic soils — area?
- Pitcairn ranks 105th and Tonga ranks 105th of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Drained organic soils — Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from drained organic soils consists of nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from the mineralization and oxidation of organic matter in organic soils that are drained for agricultural activities.