Angola vs China: Drained organic soils — Area, per capita
Angola
0.0002 ha per person
in 2024
China
0.0001 ha per person
in 2024
Angola rank
75th
China rank
77th
Drained organic soils — Area, per capita over time
- Angola
- China
How they compare
Angola currently reports 0.0002 ha per person against 0.0001 ha per person in China, a difference of 0.0001 ha per person.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.9 times China's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 75th and China ranks 77th of 189 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0006 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | Angola |
| 2000s | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Angola |
| 2010s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Angola |
| 2020s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher drained organic soils — area, per capita, Angola or China?
- Angola, at 0.0002 ha per person against 0.0001 ha per person in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in drained organic soils — area, per capita between Angola and China?
- 0.0001 ha per person, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and China?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Angola and China rank globally for drained organic soils — area, per capita?
- Angola ranks 75th and China ranks 77th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Drained organic soils — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Drained organic soils — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.