Brazil vs Namibia: Drained organic soils — Area, per capita
Brazil
0.0001 ha per person
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Brazil rank
84th
Namibia rank
87th
Drained organic soils — Area, per capita over time
- Brazil
- Namibia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0.0001 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Namibia, a difference of 0.0001 ha per person.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.8 times Namibia's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 84th and Namibia ranks 87th of 189 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Brazil |
| 2000s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Brazil |
| 2010s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Brazil |
| 2020s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher drained organic soils — area, per capita, Brazil or Namibia?
- Brazil, at 0.0001 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in drained organic soils — area, per capita between Brazil and Namibia?
- 0.0001 ha per person, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Namibia rank globally for drained organic soils — area, per capita?
- Brazil ranks 84th and Namibia ranks 87th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Drained organic soils — Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Drained organic soils — Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.